Logotipo del repositorio
  • Comunidades
  • Explorar Repositorio
    • Autores
    • Título
    • Materias
    • Fecha de publicación
  • Guías de ayuda
    • Sobre el repositorio
    • Guía de autoarchivo
    • Preguntas frecuentes
    • English
    • Español
    • Iniciar sesión
      ¿Nuevo Usuario? Pulse aquí para registrarse¿Has olvidado tu contraseña?
    1. Inicio
    2. Buscar por autor

    Examinando por Autor "Washif, Jad Adrian"

    Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
    Resultados por página
    Opciones de ordenación
    • Cargando...
      Miniatura
      Ítem
      Current Periodization, Testing, and Monitoring Practices of Strength and Conditioning Coaches
      (Human Kinetics, Inc., 2025) Washif, Jad Adrian
      This study investigated the periodization, testing, and monitoring practices of strength and conditioning practitioners across different levels of coaching experience and sports. Methods: An online survey was completed by 58 practitioners (25 sports/events) from 9 Southeast and East Asian countries. The survey focused on periodization models, programming frameworks, unloading strategies, fitness assessments, and pretraining readiness monitoring. Frequency analysis and chi-square tests were used to assess data distribution and differences. Results: Hybrid (multiple) periodization was favored over a single model for different training objectives (39%–45%), including very short-term training (≤4 wk). Emerging approaches, including flexible programming, were similarly adopted (43%). Program adjustment was primarily driven by athlete feedback (90%), self-observation (78%), and technical execution (74%). Major programming challenges identified were managing fatigue (72%), optimizing training stimuli (53%), specificity (50%), and adherence (47%). Deloading practices (95%) and tapering applications (91%) were common. Physical performance changes were primarily identified from testing (90%) but also athlete/coach feedback (76%), monitoring (71%), training data (67%), and performance data/statistics (62%). Strength assessments were conducted 2 to 4 times yearly (67%) using 1 to 4 exercises (76%). Pretraining readiness was monitored via conversations (71%), wellness tools (46%), and performance devices (31%). Practitioners also utilized monitoring technology, force plates (21%), and velocity-tracking devices (23%). Training load was commonly quantified using volume load (81%) and session RPE (72%). None of the comparisons differed across experience levels and sports types (P > .05). Conclusion: Practitioners adopted multiple periodization models, incorporating flexible approaches. Unloading strategies were commonly applied alongside various assessment methods. Technologies were used for monitoring, but conversational/subjective methods remained more widespread.
    facebookinstagramtwitterYoutubelinkedin

    La Universidad

    • Normativa Institucional
    • Modelo Formativo
    • Planificación Estratégica
    • Transparencia
    • Acreditación
    • Imagen Corporativa

    Unidades

    • Vinculación con el Medio
    • Investigación
    • Internacional
    • Desarrollo y Relaciones Institucionales

    Servicios

    • Matrícula
    • Financiamiento
    • Biblioteca
    • Pago Online
    • Certificados en línea
    • Bolsa de trabajo Alumni

    Programas

    • Carreras Diurnas
    • Carreras Vespertinas
    • Cursos
    • Diplomados
    • Magíster
    • Especialidades

    Contáctanos

    • Avda. Pedro de Valdivia 1509
      Providencia, Santiago
    • Código Postal: 7501015
    • +56 2 24207100